Von: Mike Spilligan
Many thanks for posting this. It really ought to have a wider audience.
View ArticleVon: Edward Spalton
Until the mid Seventies, climate alarmists (including a few who are prominent warmists today) believed that the burning of coal was bringing about GLOBAL COOLING by the effect of soot and aerosols...
View ArticleVon: DirkH
As I wrote yesterday, Greenpeace in Europe fights coal where they can and has just managed to make a Dutch court stop the construction of a half finished coal plant by RWE....
View ArticleVon: Ed Caryl
China must fertilize rice production to feed their growing population. CO2 and power at the same time. What a deal! Every 7 ppm increase in CO2 increases the rice crop by 1%.
View ArticleVon: Davo
CO2 by itself is NOT A GREENHOUSE GAS, It does trap water though which is a greenhouse gas. Burning coal releases Sulphur which is a greenhouse COOLING gas. Sulphur is accused of causing acid rain and...
View ArticleVon: cementafriend
Davo, maybe you have a problem with your writing or you have no technical knowledge. CO2 (carbon dioxide) does not trap water but it is slightly soluble in water. Some 50% of emissions are absorbed by...
View ArticleVon: NoTricksZone – climate news from Germany – New Resource Link |...
[...] liked the article titled “Global Coal Consumption Jumps almost 50% – Yet Global Temps Drop!” Pierre gives this summary: But now that we know burning coal has hardly a noticeable impact on [...]
View Article
